Read the article. Classify each sentence below as a Main Idea, a Supporting Detail, or Irrelevant for a summary.
Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Would anyone in 1975 have believed that a machine could one day write poetry, diagnose illness, and argue philosophy — all before breakfast? Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.
Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since. For her, artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic curiosity — it is a colleague she did not choose but has come to rely on.
The scale of the shift is difficult to overstate. One recent industry report estimates that AI tools now assist in over 30% of medical diagnoses made in leading hospitals worldwide. What began as an experiment in laboratories has quietly become infrastructure.
Yet for every efficiency gained, a question is raised. We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.
Both camps agree on one thing: the technology is not coming — it has already arrived. The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.
For each set of specific details, choose the best "umbrella sentence" that summarises them as one general statement.
Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review.
One recent industry report estimates that AI tools now assist in over 30% of medical diagnoses made in leading hospitals worldwide.
Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.
The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.
Choose the grammatically correct version for a summary. Remember: summaries use the simple present tense.
Choose the more formal, objective option suitable for an academic summary.
Write a full summary of the article (100–120 words) in your own words, using the present tense and a formal, objective style.
Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.
Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since.
One recent industry report estimates that AI tools now assist in over 30% of medical diagnoses made in leading hospitals worldwide.
We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.
The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.