Read the article below. Match each highlighted quotation to the rhetorical/stylistic device it demonstrates. The devices used here are different from the ones in the reference guide above — use your own analytical judgement.
For most of the twentieth century, the American Dream had a simple shape: work hard, climb the ladder, and the good life would follow. Ask any twenty-five-year-old today whether that promise still holds, and you will likely be met with a tired laugh. Something has shifted, and it is not merely a matter of economics.
Consider Daniel Ruiz, a 27-year-old marketing associate in Ohio. He grew up watching his father clock sixty-hour weeks at a steel plant that closed twice and reopened once, chasing a stability that never quite arrived. Daniel now works four days a week by choice, earning less than his father did, and describes himself as happier than his parents ever were.
He is far from alone. A recent Pew survey found that 61% of American workers under thirty now rank "time for life outside work" above salary when choosing a job. Employers who once dangled titles and corner offices are discovering that a new generation simply is not biting.
Critics call this laziness. Sociologists call it something else entirely: a rational response to a broken bargain. Their grandparents built companies; their parents built portfolios; they are building, above all, boundaries. The ambition has not disappeared — it has relocated, from the office to the self.
Whether this shift represents decline or wisdom will be argued for years. But one thing is already clear: the old ladder is rusting, and nobody under thirty seems particularly interested in climbing it.
Answer the following questions about the article's purpose, intended audience, and tone.
For most of the twentieth century, the American Dream had a simple shape: work hard, climb the ladder, and the good life would follow. Ask any twenty-five-year-old today whether that promise still holds, and you will likely be met with a tired laugh. Something has shifted, and it is not merely a matter of economics.
Consider Daniel Ruiz, a 27-year-old marketing associate in Ohio. He grew up watching his father clock sixty-hour weeks at a steel plant that closed twice and reopened once, chasing a stability that never quite arrived. Daniel now works four days a week by choice, earning less than his father did, and describes himself as happier than his parents ever were.
He is far from alone. A recent Pew survey found that 61% of American workers under thirty now rank "time for life outside work" above salary when choosing a job. Employers who once dangled titles and corner offices are discovering that a new generation simply is not biting.
Critics call this laziness. Sociologists call it something else entirely: a rational response to a broken bargain. Their grandparents built companies; their parents built portfolios; they are building, above all, boundaries. The ambition has not disappeared — it has relocated, from the office to the self.
Whether this shift represents decline or wisdom will be argued for years. But one thing is already clear: the old ladder is rusting, and nobody under thirty seems particularly interested in climbing it.
For each technique below, choose the answer that best explains its effect on the reader.
For most of the twentieth century, the American Dream had a simple shape: work hard, climb the ladder, and the good life would follow. Ask any twenty-five-year-old today whether that promise still holds, and you will likely be met with a tired laugh. Something has shifted, and it is not merely a matter of economics.
Consider Daniel Ruiz, a 27-year-old marketing associate in Ohio. He grew up watching his father clock sixty-hour weeks at a steel plant that closed twice and reopened once, chasing a stability that never quite arrived. Daniel now works four days a week by choice, earning less than his father did, and describes himself as happier than his parents ever were.
He is far from alone. A recent Pew survey found that 61% of American workers under thirty now rank "time for life outside work" above salary when choosing a job. Employers who once dangled titles and corner offices are discovering that a new generation simply is not biting.
Critics call this laziness. Sociologists call it something else entirely: a rational response to a broken bargain. Their grandparents built companies; their parents built portfolios; they are building, above all, boundaries. The ambition has not disappeared — it has relocated, from the office to the self.
Whether this shift represents decline or wisdom will be argued for years. But one thing is already clear: the old ladder is rusting, and nobody under thirty seems particularly interested in climbing it.
Click the paragraph descriptions below in the correct order to build a well-structured analysis essay (introduction → body → conclusion).
Choose a focus and write a full analysis paragraph (150–200 words) examining how the writer uses language to convey their message.
For most of the twentieth century, the American Dream had a simple shape: work hard, climb the ladder, and the good life would follow. Ask any twenty-five-year-old today whether that promise still holds, and you will likely be met with a tired laugh. Something has shifted, and it is not merely a matter of economics.
Consider Daniel Ruiz, a 27-year-old marketing associate in Ohio. He grew up watching his father clock sixty-hour weeks at a steel plant that closed twice and reopened once, chasing a stability that never quite arrived. Daniel now works four days a week by choice, earning less than his father did, and describes himself as happier than his parents ever were.
He is far from alone. A recent Pew survey found that 61% of American workers under thirty now rank "time for life outside work" above salary when choosing a job. Employers who once dangled titles and corner offices are discovering that a new generation simply is not biting.
Critics call this laziness. Sociologists call it something else entirely: a rational response to a broken bargain. Their grandparents built companies; their parents built portfolios; they are building, above all, boundaries. The ambition has not disappeared — it has relocated, from the office to the self.
Whether this shift represents decline or wisdom will be argued for years. But one thing is already clear: the old ladder is rusting, and nobody under thirty seems particularly interested in climbing it.