Auf einen Blick / At a glance

Free Abitur English practice pack: analyse a text on AI and visions of the technological future, with guided annotation tools.

Niveau / Level
B2–C1 (GER/CEFR)
Für / For
Abitur
Fertigkeiten / Skills
Leseverstehen / Reading, Schreiben / Writing
Schwerpunkt / Focus
Text analysis
Aufgaben / Tasks
5
Kosten / Cost
kostenlos, ohne Anmeldung / free, no sign-up
📘 Reference Guide: Rhetorical Devices
Rhetorical question — a question asked to make a point rather than to get an answer.
Example: "Isn't it time we asked what success really costs?"
Anecdote — a short personal story used to illustrate a wider point.
Example: "When Maria was twelve, she watched her father work three jobs to pay the rent."
Statistic — a number or piece of data used as evidence.
Example: "Nearly 40% of graduates now say they would take a pay cut for a shorter working week."
Metaphor — describing something as if it were something else, without using "like" or "as".
Example: "The corporate ladder has become a treadmill."
Direct address — speaking straight to the reader using "you" or "your".
Example: "You already know the feeling — that quiet dread on Sunday evening."
Tricolon (list of three) — three parallel words or phrases for rhythm and emphasis.
Example: "They wanted freedom, flexibility, and a reason to get out of bed."
Antithesis / contrast — placing two opposing ideas close together for effect.
Example: "Our parents chased security; we chase meaning."

Exercise 1 · Match Rhetorical Devices

Read the article below. Match each highlighted quotation to the rhetorical/stylistic device it demonstrates.

💡 Prüfungstipp / Exam tip: Never name a device without saying what it does to the reader in that sentence — "the text uses a metaphor" earns nothing on its own; naming the effect on the audience is what the mark scheme actually rewards.

The Machines We Made to Think: Living With Artificial Intelligence

Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Would anyone in 1975 have believed that a machine could one day write poetry, diagnose illness, and argue philosophy — all before breakfast? Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.

Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since. For her, artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic curiosity — it is a colleague she did not choose but has come to rely on.

The scale of the shift is difficult to overstate. The American Medical Association reports that 66% of US physicians used AI tools in their work in 2024, up from 38% in 2023. What began as an experiment in laboratories has quietly become infrastructure.

Yet for every efficiency gained, a question is raised. We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.

Both camps agree on one thing: the technology is not coming — it has already arrived. The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.

Exercise 2 · Purpose, Audience & Tone

Answer the following questions about the article's purpose, intended audience, and tone.

📄 Read the article again

Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Would anyone in 1975 have believed that a machine could one day write poetry, diagnose illness, and argue philosophy — all before breakfast? Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.

Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since. For her, artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic curiosity — it is a colleague she did not choose but has come to rely on.

The scale of the shift is difficult to overstate. The American Medical Association reports that 66% of US physicians used AI tools in their work in 2024, up from 38% in 2023. What began as an experiment in laboratories has quietly become infrastructure.

Yet for every efficiency gained, a question is raised. We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.

Both camps agree on one thing: the technology is not coming — it has already arrived. The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.

Exercise 3 · Effect Analysis

For each technique below, choose the answer that best explains its effect on the reader.

📄 Read the article again

Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Would anyone in 1975 have believed that a machine could one day write poetry, diagnose illness, and argue philosophy — all before breakfast? Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.

Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since. For her, artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic curiosity — it is a colleague she did not choose but has come to rely on.

The scale of the shift is difficult to overstate. The American Medical Association reports that 66% of US physicians used AI tools in their work in 2024, up from 38% in 2023. What began as an experiment in laboratories has quietly become infrastructure.

Yet for every efficiency gained, a question is raised. We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.

Both camps agree on one thing: the technology is not coming — it has already arrived. The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.

Exercise 4 · Order the Analysis Essay

Click the paragraph descriptions below in the correct order to build a well-structured analysis essay. Click a filled slot to send it back.

Exercise 5 · Write a Full Analysis

Write a full analysis paragraph (150–200 words) examining how the writer uses language to convey her message.

📄 Read the article again

Fifty years ago, a computer that could hold a conversation belonged firmly to science fiction. Would anyone in 1975 have believed that a machine could one day write poetry, diagnose illness, and argue philosophy — all before breakfast? Today, that machine sits quietly in millions of pockets.

Consider Dr. Amara Okafor, a radiologist in Toronto. Last year, an AI system flagged a tumour on one of her scans that she herself had missed on first review, and she has not looked at a scan the same way since. For her, artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic curiosity — it is a colleague she did not choose but has come to rely on.

The scale of the shift is difficult to overstate. The American Medical Association reports that 66% of US physicians used AI tools in their work in 2024, up from 38% in 2023. What began as an experiment in laboratories has quietly become infrastructure.

Yet for every efficiency gained, a question is raised. We taught machines to see patterns we could not; now we must decide how much of our judgement we are willing to hand over in return. Optimists see a future of longer, healthier lives. Sceptics see a slow erosion of human expertise and accountability.

Both camps agree on one thing: the technology is not coming — it has already arrived. The only real choice left is not whether artificial intelligence will shape our future, but how wisely we choose to shape it back.

Focus: Analyse how the writer uses the case study of Dr. Okafor alongside statistical evidence, and the closing antithesis, to convey her balanced argument about AI's role in the future.
0 words

🎉 All Exercises Complete!

Send your results to the teacher: